ssccouch wrote:
I thought tuning was the same on all platforms and programs? When you say you don't like their software is it because it has bugs and it's more difficult to get around? Sorry if It's a ridiculous question but when I was looking at Crome and the s300 software they look similar to me, as someone who has never touched either software, so from what you've said I'd assume it'd be bugs or just the layout that'd make it more difficult for me to learn on.
One more question, after seeing rates of my local tuner I'd assume that it's harder to tune an NA build vs a stock turbo? If I remember right it was nearly double to tune an na build vs stock turbo and they strictly mentioned it had to be stock turbo otherwise there's a price change. Should I start off low psi turbo once I feel confident to start tuning?
my preference was more based on menu formatting and feature arrangements than functionality.
For you, this is not really a concern since you have no knowledge going in. (I wish I could purge my previous knowledge and start over at times)
it's harder to tune a build in general, turbo or not. "stock turbo" or "stock non turbo" means very little work to be done as far as tuning the maps. (ie the stock maps are going to be very close)
Built means a basemap is going to be a starting point and you have to mess with everything to get it right.
Starting out, I'd go with a stock non turbo. Very little to do and you can mess with things to get used to it and see results. Stock setups are also a lot more tolerant to mistakes. (cause they happen to all of us)
Adding boost complicates things, and increases the potential damage in the case of an oops moment.