anton_ro wrote:
iif i have a atmospheric pressure sensor in my ecu, how would the car act if it is broken?
The PW0 ECU need to know the mass of air coming into the engine to
calculate the correct mass of fuel to inject.
As the PW0 doesn't connect to a sensor that reads air mass directly,
it must calculate it from other sensors.
It uses the Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensor to calculate the
air mass, but it would only be an accurate calculation at a particular
density of air.
As the air density varies with temperature & atmospheric pressure you
need to compensate for this with the signals from the Intake Air Temperature
(IAT) sensor and the Atmospheric Pressure (or Baro) sensor where
fitted.
If either one of these sensors is off or faulty, it will cause a general leaning
or richening across most of the rev/load range (not sure about WOT).
I would guess if your ECU did have a Baro sensor and it was faulty
or leaked, etc. then you would probably see a bigger effect at higher
altitude. As the air is thinner and less dense at high altitude, then
you would expect the fuel to be leaned out to match it, but if the
sensor had a leak and only read sea-level, then you would over-fuel
more and more the higher you went.
I wondered why the JDM ECU didn't have a Baro sensor but the Euro
ECU did, and I wondered whether Europe/UK is generally more mountainous
than Japan, so there might be a greater range of atmospheric pressure
to cope with than in Japan. As I'm not particularly into geography I
haven't looked into this in detail.
I believe that an ECU with a Baro sensor should be able to give more
accurate fueling under a wider range of conditions than a non-Baro ECU,
as the Atmospheric Pressure would have to be guesstimated on a non
-Baro ECU.
I shall tinker further with my ECU's as time permits.
Hope this explanation helps.
Tink!