pgmfi.org

Hacking up Honda's ECU
It is currently Sat Oct 04, 2025 5:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:57 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Oxford, England
As said does anybody know the difference between these two ECU's

Do both have knock sensors?

Thanks, Paul.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 7:01 pm
Posts: 200
jdm 000
edm eoo

and yes


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:40 am
Posts: 13
x00 what is that then? is there any major difference in these ecus?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 71
Location: Bristol, UK.
Well as I have both in bits on the table in front of me, I can say
that the PW0-000 is the JDM CRX SiR which has a separate knock
board.

The PW0-000 is in the UK (I don't know about other countries as well)
CRX VT. It does NOT have a knock board, but it does have an
atmospheric pressure sensor on the board, which the JDM one
does not.

Hope this helps.

Tink!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:40 am
Posts: 13
i have a crx vtec
if i have a atmospheric pressure sensor in my ecu, how would the car act if it is broken? my car is a little strange, the rpm goes up and down when i rev past 2000 rpm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 71
Location: Bristol, UK.
anton_ro wrote:
iif i have a atmospheric pressure sensor in my ecu, how would the car act if it is broken?


The PW0 ECU need to know the mass of air coming into the engine to
calculate the correct mass of fuel to inject.

As the PW0 doesn't connect to a sensor that reads air mass directly,
it must calculate it from other sensors.

It uses the Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensor to calculate the
air mass, but it would only be an accurate calculation at a particular
density of air.

As the air density varies with temperature & atmospheric pressure you
need to compensate for this with the signals from the Intake Air Temperature
(IAT) sensor and the Atmospheric Pressure (or Baro) sensor where
fitted.

If either one of these sensors is off or faulty, it will cause a general leaning
or richening across most of the rev/load range (not sure about WOT).

I would guess if your ECU did have a Baro sensor and it was faulty
or leaked, etc. then you would probably see a bigger effect at higher
altitude. As the air is thinner and less dense at high altitude, then
you would expect the fuel to be leaned out to match it, but if the
sensor had a leak and only read sea-level, then you would over-fuel
more and more the higher you went.

I wondered why the JDM ECU didn't have a Baro sensor but the Euro
ECU did, and I wondered whether Europe/UK is generally more mountainous
than Japan, so there might be a greater range of atmospheric pressure
to cope with than in Japan. As I'm not particularly into geography I
haven't looked into this in detail.

I believe that an ECU with a Baro sensor should be able to give more
accurate fueling under a wider range of conditions than a non-Baro ECU,
as the Atmospheric Pressure would have to be guesstimated on a non
-Baro ECU.

I shall tinker further with my ECU's as time permits.

Hope this explanation helps.

Tink!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:40 am
Posts: 13
ok,
if i have one, can i se it if i open the ecu?
is the pw0 x00 a jdm or a europen ecu?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:57 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Oxford, England
Thank you very much Tim, much appreciated.

I look forward to reading more of you threads in the future.

(always good when things are explained in Leymans terms)

Paul.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:33 am
Posts: 2
Location: South / SW UK
Back to back comparison of European PW0 ECUs
As I prepare to modify my Uk 1990 CRX 1.6i-vt I have recently done some dyno runs to assess whether I need to remap following header change to a Feel's 4-2-1 item (with two O2 sensor positions). To monitor AFR I have fitted a wideband sensor to the collector area - in fact for convenience just aft of the collector at the front of my cat replacement pipe.
Once content that fuelling was OK (AFR near stochiometric at 14.3 to 14.6 before VTEC, richening to 12.6 to 12.3 once in VTEC and stabilising at 13.7 near peak revs) I also did some back to back runs to compare a PW0 E00 with a PW0 X00.
Overall the test demonstrated that the Feel's header had improved the delivery of torque, with a steep rise following VTEC initiation and remaining nearly flat from 5500 to 7300 rpm. Peak torque was up by 4% over a standard set up on the same dyno too and power up by a similar amount.
The ECU comparison was interesting, in general the E00 gave 3 to 3.5 hp more, except on a day when a deep low pressure system was over the SW, then the X00 gave 1 to 2 hp more than the E00.
This would seem to indicate that the difference betwwen the 2 ECUs might be in the barometric sensor programming or response? This would make sense as the X00 ECU came from German market car, cars bound for mainland Europe may have been set up to cope with more mountainous regions such as the Alps.
Next stage for me is to chip the X00 ECU and start adjusting the advance figures before going for a rebuild to turn my B16A1 into a quasi B16B.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:36 pm
Posts: 137
Location: Middlesbrough, UK
tinker_tim wrote:
anton_ro wrote:
iif i have a atmospheric pressure sensor in my ecu, how would the car act if it is broken?


The PW0 ECU need to know the mass of air coming into the engine to
calculate the correct mass of fuel to inject.

As the PW0 doesn't connect to a sensor that reads air mass directly,
it must calculate it from other sensors.

It uses the Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensor to calculate the
air mass, but it would only be an accurate calculation at a particular
density of air.

As the air density varies with temperature & atmospheric pressure you
need to compensate for this with the signals from the Intake Air Temperature
(IAT) sensor and the Atmospheric Pressure (or Baro) sensor where
fitted.

If either one of these sensors is off or faulty, it will cause a general leaning
or richening across most of the rev/load range (not sure about WOT).

I would guess if your ECU did have a Baro sensor and it was faulty
or leaked, etc. then you would probably see a bigger effect at higher
altitude. As the air is thinner and less dense at high altitude, then
you would expect the fuel to be leaned out to match it, but if the
sensor had a leak and only read sea-level, then you would over-fuel
more and more the higher you went.

I wondered why the JDM ECU didn't have a Baro sensor but the Euro
ECU did, and I wondered whether Europe/UK is generally more mountainous
than Japan, so there might be a greater range of atmospheric pressure
to cope with than in Japan. As I'm not particularly into geography I
haven't looked into this in detail.

I believe that an ECU with a Baro sensor should be able to give more
accurate fueling under a wider range of conditions than a non-Baro ECU,
as the Atmospheric Pressure would have to be guesstimated on a non
-Baro ECU.

I shall tinker further with my ECU's as time permits.

Hope this explanation helps.

Tink!


Tim - The PW0-000 Reads from ADCR4, can you tell me where this signal goes? It might be possible to transplant a Atmospheric sensor into the pw0-000

Let me know what you think...
Si.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 2
As I understand, a EDM PW0-X/E00 ecu will not run EDM PW0-000 code.
Although sharing the same engine, the JDM EF8 run a tighter factory tune compared to the EDM EE8. (+10HP)

If I copy the fuel/ignition tables (and other settings like vtec engagement) from the JDM bin to the EDM bin, would it run the same?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:52 pm
Posts: 2
Pandor wrote:
As I understand, a EDM PW0-X/E00 ecu will not run EDM PW0-000 code.
Although sharing the same engine, the JDM EF8 run a tighter factory tune compared to the EDM EE8. (+10HP)

If I copy the fuel/ignition tables (and other settings like vtec engagement) from the JDM bin to the EDM bin, would it run the same?


Did you tested it already?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:48 pm
Posts: 1
I just did this to my PW0-X00. Maps and VTEC crossover. It drives more aggressive and quite noticeable, the vtec crossover is much smoother, to a point where it is hard to tell when VTEC engages by just listening to the engine. I have no access to a dyno so I cannot confirm it has actually gained some ponies, but I would be surprised if it hasn't.

- NovaVTEC


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:52 pm
Posts: 2
Chiel1975 wrote:
I just did this to my PW0-X00. Maps and VTEC crossover. It drives more aggressive and quite noticeable, the vtec crossover is much smoother, to a point where it is hard to tell when VTEC engages by just listening to the engine. I have no access to a dyno so I cannot confirm it has actually gained some ponies, but I would be surprised if it hasn't.

- NovaVTEC


That would be great to know :D No agressive VTEC coulb be from better performance, smooth transition. If someone has a before dyno and after... would be awesome.

Thanks for you answer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 11:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:00 am
Posts: 208
Location: seattle washington, usa
I wondered why the JDM ECU didn't have a Baro sensor but the Euro
ECU did, and I wondered whether Europe/UK is generally more mountainous
than Japan, so there might be a greater range of atmospheric pressure
to cope with than in Japan. As I'm not particularly into geography I
haven't looked into this in detail.
[/quote]

tim, ecus that do not have an internal PA sensor(BARO) use an external PA sensor usually mounted near the ecu with a single 6mm bolt. And to further complicate things, OBD2 ecus dont have an internal or external PA, they take a reading from the MAP in the milliseconds it takes you turn your key from "RUN" to "START" to determine baro at the time of start. Just a little useless information.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group